Just about everyone was happy to wave goodbye to 2020. By the spring it was shaping up to be the worst year for markets since 2008: when the market touched bottom on March 23, Canadian, U.S. and international equities were all showing huge losses. From peak to trough, Canadian equities had declined more than 37%, and foreign markets saw losses between 26% and 29%.
Even the safety net had gaping holes: Canadian bond ETFs saw peak-to-trough price drops of about 14%, which no one had ever seen before.
Then, almost as quickly as the markets fell, they roared back more swiftly than anyone expected. For example, the Vanguard Growth ETF Portfolio (VGRO) declined more than 25% in 40 ugly days during February and March, then had fully recovered just 196 days later. The whiplash was enough to make you want a neck brace to go with your face mask.
Last year was also the first in which my model portfolios consisted of asset allocation ETFs from Vanguard and iShares. Below I’ve presented a summary of the 2020 results for the individual equity and fixed income components in these products. Then we look at the overall return of the all-in-one asset allocation ETFs, as well as the returns of the two-ETF portfolios in my models.
For a deep-dive into the performance of the asset allocation ETFs in 2020, watch Justin’s video recap of one of the weirdest years investors have experienced in recent memory:
Equities
Canadian equity ETFs, which fell hardest in the spring of 2020, managed to finish the year on solid ground:
Vanguard FTSE Canada All Cap Index ETF (VCN) | 4.8% |
iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC) | 5.6% |
The 0.80% difference in returns between these two ETFs was a surprise: it arose because VCN started the year tracking the FTSE Canada All Cap Index, which had a quirky methodology that adjusted the weighting of some companies, rather than simply using their market cap. In June, the Vanguard ETF switched its benchmark to the FTSE Canada All Cap Domestic Index, which better represents the broad Canadian equity market. The returns of VCN and XIC should be more similar going forward.
U.S. equity ETFs continued their dominance in 2020. The ETFs tracking this market performed almost in lockstep:
Vanguard U.S. Total Market Index ETF (VUN) | 18.2% |
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) | 18.1% (in CAD) |
International equities—in both developed and emerging markets—also delivered tidy returns in 2020. As we’ve talked about in previous blogs and videos, comparing the individual components of the Vanguard and iShares ETFs in these asset classes is confusing, because the two index providers disagree about South Korea: the Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (VIU) tracks an index of developed countries that includes Korea, while the iShares Core MSCI EAFE IMI Index ETF (XEF) excludes Korea, as MSCI classifies it as an emerging market.
As it happens, this was a big deal in 2020, as Korean stocks returned over 43% in Canadian dollar terms. This provided a boost to VIU relative to XEF. Of course, opposite was true for their counterparts in emerging markets, with the iShares index getting the edge:
So, how did all of these equity categories perform when combined in the Vanguard and iShares asset allocation ETFs? Here’s how the two all-equity funds performed in 2020:
Vanguard All-Equity ETF Portfolio (VEQT) | 11.3% |
iShares Core Equity ETF Portfolio (XEQT) | 11.7% |
Fixed income
It was the best of times, it was the worst of times for bonds in 2020. Concerns about liquidity in fixed income markets led to bond ETFs seeing huge price declines during the COVID crisis in March. But this problem cleared up quickly and bonds went on to post their best calendar year since 2014.
The yield to maturity of broad-market Canadian bond ETFs started the year at 2.3% and then plummeted to around 1.2% by year-end. Remember, a decline in yield increases bond prices, so the result was a surprising total return for the Vanguard and iShares flagship ETFs:
Vanguard Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VAB) | 8.6% |
iShares Core Canadian Universe Bond Index ETF (XBB)Â | 8.6% |
If you’re using my two-fund model portfolios with bond allocations of 70%, 50% or 30%, then one of the above two ETFs makes up all of your fixed income holdings. However, if you’re using one of the all-in-one ETF portfolios, then you’ll also have some other bond asset classes in the mix.
The iShares Core Canadian Short Term Corporate Bond Index ETF (XSH), which make up 15% of the fixed income in the iShares portfolios, delivered 6.2% in 2020.
The Vanguard U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VBU) returned 7.2%, while the U.S. bond ETFs held by the iShares portfolios (GOVT and USIG) combined to returned between 8% and 9% in Canadian dollars.
Finally, the Vanguard Global ex-U.S. Aggregate Bond Index ETF (VBG), which invests in foreign bonds outside of the U.S., managed just 3.9% during 2020.
Overall, then, the addition of these bond asset classes lowered the fixed income returns for the Vanguard and iShares all-in-one ETFs, compared with simply using VAB or XBB. If we take the weighted average of each ETF’s return, we can estimate a return of 7.2% for the Vanguard fixed income portfolios and approximately 8.2% for the iShares versions.
All together now
All right, it’s time to end the suspense and reveal the 2020 returns for each of the Vanguard and iShares asset allocation ETFs, as well as the two-ETF portfolios that combine a bond ETF and an all-equity fund. For a fairer comparison, the two-ETF portfolios are assumed to have been rebalanced monthly.
Asset allocation | Vanguard ETFs | Return | iShares ETFs | Return |
---|---|---|---|---|
80% bonds / 20% equities | VCIP | 8.35% | XINC | 9.35% |
70% bonds / 30% equities | VAB + VEQT | 9.73% | XBB + XEQT | 9.84% |
60% bonds / 40% equities | VCNS | 9.37% | XCNS | 10.33% |
50% bonds / 50% equities | VAB + VEQT | 10.35% | XBB + XEQT | 10.53% |
40% bonds / 60% equities | VBAL | 10.20% | XBAL | 10.58% |
30% bonds / 70% equities | VAB + VEQT | 10.82% | XBB + XEQT | 11.10% |
20% bonds / 80% equities | VGRO | 10.81% | XGRO | 11.42% |
Source: Vanguard, BlackRock, DFA Returns 2.0
As always, we need to be careful about drawing conclusions from short-term results.
First, the two-ETF portfolios saw relatively better performance than the one-fund options last year, simply because all-Canadian bond indexes outpaced more globally diversified fixed income portfolios last year. That won’t always be the case.
Moreover, the main reason iShares portfolios outperformed is their significantly larger allocation to US equities, the top performer in 2020. In any year when US markets lag Canada and international markets, the Vanguard portfolios are likely to have the edge. Over the long term, the differences are likely to be very small.
There’s another factor to consider as you ponder the events of last year. Many investors opt to build their own diversified portfolios using multiple ETFs rather than embracing the simplicity of the asset allocation funds. While this decision saved few a few basis points in MER last year, it would also have required you to do some major rebalancing—twice.
The first opportunity was in March, when you would have been selling bonds and buying stocks when it looked like the world might end. If you had the stomach to do that, you may have had to rebalance in the other direction, selling stocks to buy more bonds late in the year, following the amazing recovery.
Neither of those decisions was easy. However, if you were using an all-in-one ETF, this was all done for you, and you would have endured a tumultuous year with a return between 8.4% and 11.4%, with zero work, no matter what your asset allocation. It’s another reminder that successful investing isn’t about scratching and clawing for every basis point in fees and taxes. It’s about getting the big decisions right and avoiding crippling mistakes.
People who spend time south in their retirement when withdrawing funds is there a tax benefit to what funds to cash in to live
Hello,
I have a question regarding your model ETF portfolios. Both the iShares and the Vanguard portfolios ones appear to be combination of two ETFs. However, in your blogs and comments, you are referring to them as a one-ETF strategy that does not rebalancing. Can you please clarify?
Thanks,
Vlad
@Vlad: Please see the details on the Model Portfolios page:
When you mention if we want a 70/30 allocation, we can use VEQT and VAB for bonds. That sounds great, but when I did the calculations, wouldn’t that be over 50% Canadian? VEQT allots 30% to Canadian and VAB is Canadian. So If I had 100,000 to invest, 30,000 would go to VAB bond and 21,000 would be Canadian stocks from VEQT. That would be 51,000 Canadian out of a 100,000 investment. Is that too much invested into Canadian or am I overthinking?
@Nancy: The allocation you describe would be over 50% in Canadian currency, but as a Canadian resident that’s appropriate. That’s not the same thing as holding 50% Canadian equities, which likely would be too much.
Hi Dan,
I’m currently in a 70/30 split with 50% each of Xbal and Xgro. Is it more beneficial to go with the VEQT/VAB split?
Also, I know you cant advise, but some quarters would suggest 70/30 is too conservative for a 40 year old with a DB pension. I think it’s a good balance. Am I off base here?
@Shane: Using a a mix of XGRO and XBAL (or VGRO and VBAL) to achieve a mix of 70% equities and 30% fixed income is a perfectly good alternative to mixing a bond ETF with XEQT or VEQT. This is the strategy Justin recommends on his blog, Canadian Portfolio Manager.
The main difference between the two options is that mixing XGRO/XBAL or VGRO/VBAL gives you foreign diversification in bonds, whereas using XBB or VAB means Canadian bonds only. Over the long term, this is not likely to make a big difference. So choose whichever method you prefer.
As for your decision to hold 70% equities, don’t ever let anyone (especially random people online who don’t know you) tell you that you should be taking more risk. Only you can determine how much risk you’re comfortable with. For what it’s worth, as an advisor I rarely recommend more than 70% equities, even for people younger than 40, unless they have lived through a genuine bear market that lasted more than a few weeks (March 2020 doesn’t count).
Hi Dan,
Many thanks for all that you have done for us over the years! I’ve had a well diversified portfolio of ETF’s for years now and satisfied with the returns. I plan on continuing with this strategy long term. Lately, I’ve been noticing more discussions online about options trading as a potential “side hustle” to start off with and see how it goes from there. If I decided to pursue this, I would need to invest hours of learning how it works exactly and what the potential risks and rewards are, which I’m willing to do because it sounds interesting to me.
Just wondering what your opinion is on options trading and whether it’s worth investing the time to learn the right strategies?
Want to buy USD EFTs in registered accounts (spousal RRSP, TFSA and RESP) using US dollars.Possible, options? Thank you.
@Franco: I think it is highly unlikely that a DIY investor will find options trading to be a profitable exercise. It’s probably more likely to sabotage all the hard work and discipline you put it into building an maintaining your ETF portfolio. One of the challenges with index investing is that it doesn’t offer much in the way of excitement. It can definitely be tempting to try a “side hustle” to spice things up a bit. If you go that route, I’d encourage you to do so with only a very small percentage of your portfolio (less than 5%).
I am new to self-directed investment and have allocated my funds based on this blog’s portfolios, and it includes a bond ETF (ZDB). However, as someone that is in for the long run (hoping to retire in 7 to 10 years), I am struggling to see the point in having bond ETF in my portfolio. In your response @Shane you say “I rarely recommend more than 70% equities”, and I understand that is because of volatility, but bond ETF is subject to volatility without the growth opportunity. So, why bother? Or am I missing some important point here?
@CanadianCouchPotato Thank you for the model portfolios. I see that the pdf has lowest 1 year return but do you have any data for largest drawdown?
@Season: Bonds have some volatility, but it’s nothing like that of stocks. You should always remember that even a diversified stock portfolio can lose half its value. That happened as recently as 2008–09. Unless you’re prepared to weather a drawdown like that, an all-equity portfolio isn’t appropriate.
I might also offer that 7 to 10 years to retirement is a medium time frame at best. Stocks have seen several periods of negative returns 7 years. This blog might help with your asset allocation decision:
https://canadiancouchpotato.com/2010/11/10/ready-willing-and-able-to-take-risk/
Hi CCP,
I am new DIY investor and your site has been highly useful in gaining the knowledge. Thank you for helping people like me.
I am starting to build my rrsp portfolio and based on my readings here it seems that for investment in US stocks, buying US ETFs (using NG to convert cad to usd ) is better option than buying TD e series due to FWT.
Your thought please
@DJ: https://www.moneysense.ca/save/investing/is-it-worth-it-to-buy-etfs-on-an-american-exchange/
I just finished Jlcollins’s Simple Path to Wealth and I am struggling to address one issue. I am certainly not alone wondering why not investing everything in a US total market index ETF (VUS or VUN) or VTI if we want to play with USD. His strategy is simple, annualized yield beats any diversified portfolio on the long run. Is there a reason why we should rather diversify our portfolio with Canadian and international stocks than going 100% US? I mean a reason other than reducing volatility. Per example: why not 100% in VUS instead of 100% VEQT?
@Christian: https://www.moneysense.ca/save/investing/etfs/sp-500-etf-portfolio/
It is hard to stop chasing the wild goose I guess! Thank you for the reminder!
Hello Dan,
I am new in investing and your site Help me a lot .
I have a question here: which are the US ETF that you recommend we can buy for a cash and registered US accounts?
I have VBAL and XBAL in my CAd RRsp and CAD cash and I m looking for something similar in US. Dollar
Thank you
Hello Dan,
I have been investing in the model ETF portfolio VAB, VCN, VUN,XEF and XEC for quite a few years now. Considering the fact that markets are at all time high and we may be due a market correction at some point in the future with rising inflation and higher interest rates around the corner, is it “safer” to allocate more (new) money to VAB versus the other ETF’s? Thanks.
@Koen: That sort of thinking is seductive, but it’s a slippery slope. A market correction, rising interest rates and higher inflation are always “just around the corner.” (And for the record, if you believe interest rate will rise, it would not make sense to buy more bonds, as bonds fall in value when rates rise.) A better strategy is to simply stick with your target asset mix all the time, and to rebalance following market crashes and rate hikes.
Hi! Love your blog and it was a great help for me when starting to invest. I did the real ‘couch potato’ thing and have just been buying the same things and sitting back the past few years.
I noticed you changed all the portfolios around though since I haven’t checked back in a long time.
Is there any way you could leave old ones up or have the time to do the comparisons of the individual ETF strategies you used to? I still follow that strategy as I’m sure others do as well since it seems inefficient to switch it now (VCN/XAW (XEC/XEF)/XUU/ZAG or ZDB for unreg)!!
Thanks so much.
@Tammy: As the model portfolios have evolved over the years I have not kept the older versions on the site. In TFSAs or RRSPs I actually would recommend switching to the one-fund versions the next time you rebalance. In a taxable account, I recognize that could cause taxable gains that you would rather defer. If you are using the older models, all you need to do is make sure your target equity holding is roughly one-third VCN and two-thirds XAW.
Do you recommend me buying Xeqt only? Or do you recommend the 80/20 split. I am 27 years old I feel I have high risk tolerance
@Sean: I can’t make recommendations for you specifically. In general, few investors have the stomach (or the need) for an all-equity portfolio. Certainly anyone who has been investing only since 2009 has never been battle-tested and doesn’t really know how they would behave in a deep, prolonged bear market. An 80/20 split is likely to be a better risk-reward trade-off for most aggressive investors.
Hi here,
It’s a very interesting topic and data.
There is one issue for me. It doesn’t reflect what I calculated.
I took XGRO ETF price on Dec 31 2020 $23.22 subtract price on Dec 31 2019 $21.56 and divided by $21.56.
(23.22-21.56)/21.56*100= 7.7%
It’s very far from claimed here 11.42%. what am I doing wrong?
@Igor: ETF returns are calculated using NAV, not market price. You also need to factor in the distributions, which are assumed to be reinvested immediately. For XGRO, the NAV on Dec 31, 2019 was $21.32 and the NAV on Dec 31, 2020 was $23.24. There were four distributions totalling $0.46. All of these numbers are available on the iShares website.
A rough calculation is (($23.24 + $0.46) – $21.32) / $21.32 = 11.17%. The small difference is explained by the timing of the distributions: my rough calculation assumes they were all made at the end of the year, but in fact they were made quarterly.
Hope this helps.
Hi Dan,
I am also using your older model (Xaw, vcn, xec, zag). Above you stated for rrsp and TFSA you recommend switching to the all-in-one asset allocation ETF you recommend. Can you please clarify why? Would you not have more flexibility to make larger gains if you hold actual Bond ETF that you can sell to rebalance in market downturns?
Thanks!
Jason
@Jason: Many investors assume they will get a “rebalancing bonus” if they hold individual ETFs. The first point to understand is that this is usually not true. Rebalancing is designed to control risk, not increase returns.
In any case, asset allocation ETFs simply do the rebalancing for you. Following a market crash, for example, they will need to sell bonds and buy more stocks to maintain their targets, just as you would do yourself. The difference is that they will do it with discipline, whereas individual investors may not.
Hi Dan,
Any recommendations or resources to consider for us for investing in a non-registered account. TFSAs are maxed out. Both of us are self employed. To have a baby in the next 6 months. Were thinking of saving money to fund our own ‘maternity leave’ fund. Ideally having something that we can easily add money to over the next 6 months and also withdraw in spurts with ease.
Many thanks – for this query and for the information in the past years.
@Vince: Based on what you describe, it sounds like you should not be investing outside your TFSA: you should just be holding cash. Your time horizon is much to short to hold stocks or bonds.
Looking to retire early in 10 years hopefully. $500,000. Should we be choosing VBAL or XBAL for the entire portfolio?
Or should we be speaking to a CFP at a firm, fee management based at this level?
Thanks,
Scott
@Scott James Smith: If you’re comfortable investing on your own with asset allocation ETF, you might consider working with a fee-for-service financial planner who does not manage investments. They can help you determine whether a 60/40 asset lix (as in VBAL and XBAL) is appropriate for you and help you plan for your early retirement.
Thanks for your reply Dan!
So a adviser fee – for service financial (gives a road map plan basically for a one time fee ) or a wealth management CFP who takes a percentage of AUM all year long?
@Scott James Smith: That depends entirely on what you need. I’m a huge fan of fee-for-service planning for people who are comfortable carrying out the steps in that plan and managing their own investment portfolio. This model can work extremely well for the right person. It’s less helpful for those who will go home with an excellent plan and then fail to act on it. It’s also important to remember that fee-for-service planners will usually recommend an asset allocation, but they can’t help you design or implement your portfolio.
The full-service model is more comprehensive, but you need to understand how much you’re paying and what you’re getting in return. The scope and quality of planning services in this model varies a lot. Some investment advisors who charge a percentage of AUM do no planning at all. That is often the case for those who have relatively modest accounts, unfortunately. So if you’re not able to work with a firm that charges a reasonable AUM fee and delivers high-quality planning, then fee-for-service plus DIY investing can often be a better option.
Husband / Wife both 45 years old, Home is Mortage free ($550,000), Rental proptery (mortage free $350,000 / generates $15,000 profit a year), $500,000 in RRSP/TFSA to put in VBAL/XBAL for 10 years. Wife has a defined Ohmer’s pension plan with early bridge factor. We want to retire in fully in mid 50’s.
Zero debt. Everything is paid for.
We do not have a complicated scenario. We now only have 2 T4’s a year.
Set it and forget it with VBAL/XBAL. Or pay the big firms?
Hi Dan,
Thank you very much for the Blog, it has helped me a lot.
I am a new investor and want to buy ETFs for my TFSA account but I am not certain to pick which ones? Are ZHY, ZFH, ZUT, VRE, or ZRE good picks?
Also, I can not make a decision between ZPAY.U and VTI.
are ZWC and ZWE good in an open account?
Thank you.
@sara: Thanks for your comment. By ETF recommendations are on my Model Portfolios page.