If you’re investing outside of tax-sheltered accounts like RRSPs and TFSAs, you need to choose your investments carefully—otherwise you risk giving a big slice of your returns to the good people at the Canada Revenue Agency. Today we’ll look at ways to create a tax-efficient index portfolio using some innovative ETFs.
Swapping dividends for capital gains
In Monday’s post, I explained that Canadian dividends are not always as tax-advantaged as people believe. Capital gains are not only taxed at a lower rate in the highest tax brackets, but investors can also control when to take them—dividends, on the other hand, are taxable in the year they’re paid, even if you reinvest them.
Horizons’ swap-based ETFs—which I wrote about here—were designed to address this issue. They use a type of derivative that allows investors to earn the same return as the index, without collecting any distributions. Dividends paid by the companies in the index are reflected in the fund’s return, but all of the growth is characterized as capital gains and deferred until the fund is sold. There are currently just two funds in the family: the Horizons S&P/TSX 60 (HXT) for Canadian large-cap stocks, and the Horizons S&P 500 (HXS) for US large-caps.
The tax advantage is especially large for HXS, because dividends from US companies are fully taxable, while capital gains are taxed at half that rate. Consider this: if you held the iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (XSP) in 2011, you received $0.24 per share in cash dividends, a yield of about 1.6%. At the highest tax bracket, you would have lost almost half of that to taxes, reducing your return by about 80 basis points. If you held HXS instead, you would have received a similar 1.6% price appreciation instead, and you would have paid no tax. If you eventually sell the fund at a profit, you’ll pay tax on only half the gain.
Forward thinking
Claymore’s Advantaged ETFs—read a detailed description here—use forward contracts that “recharacterize” bond interest or foreign dividends as capital gains or return of capital (ROC). Unlike swap-based ETFs, which pay no distributions, the Advantaged ETFs are design for investors who want current income.
Return of capital is the most tax-efficient of all distributions, though it’s not a free lunch. ROC is not taxed in the year it’s received: instead, it lowers your adjusted cost base, and if you sell your shares at a profit in the future, you’ll incur a capital gain. So you’re not getting truly tax-free income—you’re really just getting your own money back—but you are generating tax-deferred cash flow. This document from Claymore explains the idea.
You can see why ROC is preferable to bond interest, which is fully taxable. In 2011, the Claymore Advantaged Canadian Bond (CAB) returned 6.8%. Roughly half of that came from price appreciation, while the other half came from distributions. However, unlike every other bond ETF, those distributions were return of capital, not interest. So you would have collected that entire 6.8% return without a tax bill.
Before you get too excited, there are downsides. All of the 2011 distributions from Claymore’s Advantaged ETFs were return of capital, but that won’t always be the case. In 2010, for example, CAB’s distributions were all capital gains. These would have been taxable—albeit at only half the rate of bond interest.
More important, the Advantaged ETFs have considerably higher costs than plain-vanilla index funds, which will lower their pre-tax returns. Those added costs offset some of the tax savings, and may even wipe out the advantage altogether. For example, both the iShares DEX Universe Bond (XBB) and BMO Aggregate Bond (ZAG) returned well over 9% last year—dramatically outperforming CAB. Even if you lost half your interest income to taxes, you might still have been better off with XBB or ZAG.
If you’re out of RRSP and TFSA room, you could use these ETFs to build a reasonably well diversified and tax-efficient portfolio of Canadian stocks (HXT), US stocks (HXS) and bonds (CAB). In some years—including 2011—you’ll have no tax payable at all. Just spend some time researching these complex products first, and don’t invest in anything you don’t understand simply because you think you’ll save some tax.
H&R Block software giveaway
Speaking of tax, the folks at H&R Block have offered to give away copies of their DIY tax software to five lucky Canadian Couch Potato readers. To enter the draw, leave a comment below or tweet this post to your followers before midnight EST on Sunday, January 29. I’ll announce the winner next Monday.
{ 60 comments… read them below or add one }
← Previous Comments
Hi Dan
First, congratulation to you for being the (acting) editor on the new February/March 2012 issue of MoneySense.
Well written article to address the tax efficiency issue of the couch potato portfolio. I hope you can add a new tax efficiency section in your model portfolio section to include the after-tax return of the potato with different tax scenario.
Please enter me to the draw. Thanks.
I’m in for the draw too – thx!
@Wallace H: Many thanks for congrats.
I may add a tax-friendly model portfolio at some point, though it would be impossible to calculate the after-tax return, because this would be different for each individual.
Great article. Please add me to the draw, thanks.
Interesting post. In Europe I understand there is a move to better regulate derivative based ETFs that use techniques such as swaps as described above. Many people bought ETFs in Europe without understanding the nature of the ETF. It is more of a concern there because of the current fragility, potential instability and undercapitalization of the banks which might put the swap agreements into question should anything bad start happening.
I do not consider it a problem here from reading the prospectuses of the swap ETFs given the capitalization levels of our banks and other indicators of stability.
@Andrew: I agree with you that the swap structure seems to be very low risk in Canada, where the collateral requirements are quite strict. In Europe, not so much.
Dan,
I look forward the tax-friendly couch potato model portfolio. Although tax situation is different for each individual, still, it helps your readers to get an overall picture of how to assemble tax-efficient portfolios outside RRSP and TFSA. For many people, the size of registered portfolio is small because of lack of capital, or deferred contribution to a later time for a better result. The February/March 2012 issue of MoneySense features the article by Sarah Efron included my story of deferred RRSP contribution to minimize tax and keep most money.
Speaking of tax, you gave an interesting example of “re-characterizing” tax-unfriendly income to capital gain/loss by way of forward contracts. By the no-arbitrage forward pricing formula, the value of expected interest/dividend income is reflected in the forward price, which determines the capital gain/loss against the spot price at disposition or at maturity.
I am interested to know how the income replication by forward contracts is affected in response to interest rate change, which is not mentioned in their articles. Stock (spot) price and dividend is affected by many factors, but the forward price is directly affected by (risk-free) interest rate per pricing formula.
@Wallace: Thanks for the comment—I thought I recognized your name.
I confess I don’t understand your question about forward contracts. I’d suggest you contact Claymore directly and ask them about how this works in the Advantaged products. They are quite good at responding to investors’ questions.
I too really look forward to the tax-friendly couch potato model portfolio!!!!
@Yves: A simple portfolio of HXT, HXS and CAB would be a good start. If you wan’t to draw some income, have a look at my Yield-Hungry Couch Potato, but take out the REITs and the iShares high-yield bond fund. The other asset classes and ETF choices in that portfolio are all quite tax-efficient.
← Previous Comments