Perhaps no number is more important to investors than the rate of return on their portfolio. Yet this seemingly simple calculation is fraught with problems. If you’ve made contributions or withdrawals during the year, calculating your rate of return is not straightforward. What’s more, there are several ways to perform the calculations: the results can differ significantly, and each method has strengths and weaknesses. No wonder so many investors have no idea how to measure or interpret their returns.
In our new white paper, Understanding Your Portfolio’s Rate of Return, Justin Bender and I introduce the various methods used to calculate a portfolio’s rate of return, explain how and why they can produce different results, and help you determine which method is most appropriate to your circumstances. Justin has also updated his popular calculators, which you can download for free on his website, Canadian Portfolio Manager.
Time and money
Rate of return calculations fall into two general categories: time-weighted and money-weighted. If a portfolio has no cash flows (that is, the investor makes no contributions and no withdrawals), both methods produce identical figures. The key point to understand, therefore, is that any differences in reported returns come about as a result of cash inflows and outflows.
To illustrate this idea, our white paper looks at each methodology as it would apply to two hypothetical investors. We assume both have a portfolio of Canadian equities valued at $250,000 at the beginning of 2014. Investor 1 contributes an additional $25,000 on September 15, while Investor 2 withdraws $25,000 on the same date.
Our examples use actual index values to make the results more relevant. Recall that in 2014 the Canadian equity markets enjoyed strong returns during the first eight months of the year, but then experienced a significant downturn in September and October. If you made a contribution or withdrawal around the time of that downturn, how would it have affected your rate of return?
We’ve got nothing but time
A time-weighted rate of return (TWRR) attempts to eliminate the effect of cash flows into or out of the portfolio. It’s the method used by mutual funds and ETFs when preparing their published performance reports, as well as the method used for measuring the performance of my model portfolios.
In our example above, both investors would have had exactly the same TWRR, even though Investor 1 made a large contribution right before a downturn, while Investor 2 made a large withdrawal. Both investors’ time-weighted returns were also identical to that of the index their portfolios were tracking.
When a TWRR is appropriate: A true time-weighted return is ideal for measuring the performance of portfolio managers against a benchmark.
Consider an advisor working with our two hypothetical clients. Investor 1 receives a $25,000 windfall and asks the advisor to add it to his portfolio. On the same day, Investor 2 requests a $25,000 withdrawal to meet an unexpected expense. Since the portfolio manager used the same strategy for both investors, he should not be rewarded or penalized for the effect of cash flows over which he had no control.
Shortcomings of the TWRR: TWRRs are generally impossible for individual investors to calculate on their own. You’d need to know the value of your portfolio on each day a cash flow occurred, but discount brokerages typically don’t make this information available.
Many people also feel TWRRs are irrelevant to individual investors, because the timing of cash flows can have a big effect on how we perceive performance. Justin offers a dramatic example of how an investor who made a large contribution just before the financial crisis of 2008–09 could have had a TWRR over 4% even though his portfolio actually lost value.
How to measure your own TWRR: While you can’t measure your true TWRR without advanced tools, the Modified Dietz method can calculate an approximate time-weighted return if you have access to month-end values for your portfolio. Use the Modified Dietz Rate of Return Calculator available on Justin’s website.
Show me the money
A money-weighted rate of return (MWRR) does not attempt to eliminate the effect of contributions and withdrawals: on the contrary, it specifically adjusts for them. For this reason it can differ substantially from the time-weighted rate of return when large cash flows occur during volatile periods.
In our example, the MWRR for Investor 1 would be significantly lower than the time-weighted rate of return because he made a large contribution prior to a period of relatively poor performance. Meanwhile, while the MWRR for Investor 2 would be significantly higher, because she made a large withdrawal prior to that downturn.
When a MWRR is appropriate: If you add or withdraw funds from your portfolio right before a big move in the markets an MWRR better reflects your personal investment experience. The Canadian Securities Administrators seem to agree: beginning in July 2016 they will require investment advisors to produce money-weighted rates of return for their clients.
Shortcomings of the MWRR: Because it is highly dependent on the timing of cash flows, the MWRR is not ideal for benchmarking portfolio managers or investment strategies. A lump-sum RRSP contribution or RRIF withdrawal, for example, can cause the portfolio’s MWRR to outperform or underperform its benchmark, which is highly misleading.
A traditional money-weighted rate of return is also calculated using an equation that can only be solved through trial and error. However, computers have made this shortcoming less important.
How to measure your own MWRR: As long as you have the starting and ending values of the portfolio and the dates of all the cash flows you can use the Money-Weighted Rate of Return Calculator available on Justin’s website.
In my next blog post, I’ll use other examples to help investors better understand the important differences between time-weighted and money-weighted rates of return.