More Promises of High Yield Without Risk

Earlier this week I argued that savings accounts and GICs are still the best vehicles for short-term savings, because higher yield comes with higher risk. I thought that was an obvious point, but it seems that even the venerable Kiplinger’s Personal Finance has forgotten this basic truth of investing.

The September 2010 issue of the popular magazine features a cover story called 10 Great Mutual Funds That Deliver High Income, by senior editor Bob Frick. The article itself makes no outrageous claims, but in a podcast interview about the piece (available at iTunes), Frick takes a journey into Fantasy Land. After lamenting the low yields of US Treasuries, and the likelihood that they will fall in value in the near future, Frick recommends a Fidelity fund that invests in emerging market bonds. “You just cannot ignore a fund that is going to pay you 12%,” he says gleefully. Going to pay? The fund in question has posted excellent returns in the past, but no bond fund is going to pay any guaranteed return. For all Frick or anyone else knows, the fund might lose 12% or more next year.

Maybe that was a slip of the tongue, I thought. But then he kept up this nonsense. “When you look what’s in it, you see it’s got the sovereign debt of Russia, Argentina, Mexico, Indonesia, and you think, ‘That can’t be so hot.’ But it also has Brazil and some other developing countries. The thing that people don’t realize is that these countries often have more fiscal discipline than the US, the UK and Western Europe. So they pay their bonds off, and they pay them off on time… Maybe if you just invested in Russia or Indonesia it would be dangerous, but it’s spread over all these different countries, so you’ve got this great diversification, and you’ve got this income that rivals the return of the stock market. And it’s more dependable. It’s like having your cake and eating it, too!”

OK, let’s get this straight. The senior editor of Kiplinger’s Personal Finance believes it’s a given that emerging-market countries “pay their bonds on time.” And therefore he believes that investors in this fund can expect a yield that rivals the return of the stock market with less risk. Perhaps he’s also built a perpetual motion machine or achieved cold fusion, too.

I’m not going to defend the fiscal policies of the US, but I think it’s fair to say that if I buy a US Treasury note, I’m going to get my interest payments, and I’m going to get my principal back. Frick magnanimously concedes this point in the interview when he says, “they’re still the safest investment in the world, blah, blah, blah.” That’s a direct quote, by the way.

How can Frick so casually brush aside the differing risks of emerging-market bonds and US Treasuries? Several of the countries he names have defaulted on their sovereign debt in the past, and they may well do so again. That’s why they yield more. And when one country has a financial crisis, investors worry that its neighbors will follow, and their bonds can lose value, too. So diversification does not necessarily offer any protection. Witness the Latin American debt crisis that peaked in the early 1980s, the Asian contagion of 1997, the Russian default of 1998, the Argentine economic crisis  of 1999–2002. This is hardly ancient history.

Emerging market debt may well be a good investment, but its potential returns are commensurate with the risks. When Frick says it’s “having your cake and eating it, too,” he’s implying that the added yield is free. That is irresponsible journalism and terrible investment advice.

Blah, blah, blah.

8 Responses to More Promises of High Yield Without Risk

  1. Canadian Capitalist August 19, 2010 at 11:02 am #

    It is amazing how much investors say they hate the US dollar, T-bills and Treasuries at “normal” times but the moment they perceive even a hint of crisis, what do they buy? Yep. US dollars, T-bills and Treasuries. That speaks volumes on what the market perceives as risky.

  2. Tiny Potato August 19, 2010 at 12:54 pm #

    It’s amazing that no matter how many stories about people getting burned exist, the “earn more $ with low/little risk” scheme seems to always attract people. I guess the lure of something for nothing is timeless.

  3. dj August 19, 2010 at 3:07 pm #

    blah blah blah. I love it!

    and personally, I can’t hear this message enough. thanks

  4. Financial Cents August 19, 2010 at 6:33 pm #

    Promises, promises. thanks for sharing this. (Sounds like awful cake :))

  5. larry macdonald August 19, 2010 at 6:40 pm #

    One home-grown case case of high yields promised at low risk that gets me is the Kevin O’Leary group of funds. They’re also all about marketing, leveraging a high profile in the media pure and simple. And 3% MERs to boot — does it get any more odiferous that this?

    http://blog.canadianbusiness.com/the-kevin-o%e2%80%99leary-funds/

  6. Brian August 20, 2010 at 2:21 pm #

    Great post Dan, we all have to watch out what we read out there. A little common sense and investing education can go a long way.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Tweets that mention More Promises of High Yield Without Risk -- Topsy.com - August 19, 2010

    […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Boomer and Echo, Dan Bortolotti. Dan Bortolotti said: More Promises of High Yield Without Risk http://bit.ly/9W0iTx […]

  2. Weekend Reading | In Search of Salt - August 23, 2010

    […] Couch Potato cautions against putting your short-term cash into high-yield/high-risk funds. The last line killed me…actually, there were a few good ones in the […]

Leave a Reply